Skip to main content Skip to footer

Quality Assurance of HCS Training

04
Our Quality Assurance (QA) team continues to progress work to strengthen national oversight of training, support trainees and supervisors, and improve the consistency and sustainability of our QA processes. This includes reviewing the outcomes of Clinical Scientist training, developing a more structured approach to supporting trainees experiencing difficulties, and introducing improvements to our routine monitoring arrangements.

Reviewing Clinical Scientist Training Outcomes and Workforce Retention

The QA team has undertaken a retrospective audit of Clinical Scientist training to better understand the outcomes of nationally supported training programmes and their contribution to the Healthcare Science workforce across Scotland.

The review considers training completion, professional registration and subsequent employment, including whether individuals remain within their original training Health Board, move to another NHS Scotland Board or continue their careers elsewhere.

This work is helping to develop a clearer understanding of the longer-term contribution of investment in Clinical Scientist training, beyond the immediate achievement of professional registration.

The information gathered will support future discussions around national training provision, recruitment priorities, workforce retention and sustainability. It will also help ensure that decisions about future training arrangements are informed by evidence of training outcomes and the workforce needs of Healthcare Science services across Scotland.

 

Developing a Consistent Approach to Supported Improvement

The QA team has been reviewing how we support trainees who experience difficulties meeting expected standards of progression. This work has been informed by our experience of supporting individual trainees and supervisors through complex progression concerns, and the opportunities identified to improve consistency, transparency and early intervention.

Draft Supported Improvement documentation has now been developed to provide a more structured approach to identifying concerns, agreeing development objectives and reviewing progress.

The proposed approach includes clear identification of the areas requiring improvement, agreed timescales, targeted learning activities and appropriate evidence to demonstrate progress. Regular reviews and documented feedback are intended to ensure that trainees understand the expectations placed upon them and that supervisors have a consistent framework for providing support and evaluating improvement.

An important consideration is ensuring that trainees are supported not only to complete individual training activities but also to develop the knowledge, professional judgement and increasing independence required for their future roles.

The supported improvement working guidance documentation remains in draft and can be accessed here: Supported Improvement: Working Guidance (draft v3).pdf. We welcome feedback from trainees, supervisors and training centres to help ensure the final approach is practical, proportionate, supportive and appropriate across different HCS specialism and training environments.

Please send any feedback or suggestions to HCSQuality@nes.scot.nhs.uk.

 

Improving QA Processes and Training Oversight

As highlighted in previous newsletters, the QA team has been working to streamline routine processes through the introduction of automation and more structured information management.

Developments relating to Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP), Training Plans and Exit Surveys are helping to improve the consistency of information collection and monitoring, including the use of automated requests, reminders and follow-up arrangements.

These processes are intended to reduce repetitive administrative work, improve the identification of outstanding requirements and allow the QA team to focus more time on supporting trainees, supervisors and training centres.

Supervisor and Training Centre Accreditation remain important priorities for further development. These processes have not yet been automated, and we recognise that backlogs remain in both areas. We appreciate the patience of supervisors and training centres awaiting accreditation outcomes and acknowledge the inconvenience these delays may cause.

Work to address the outstanding applications and develop more efficient accreditation arrangements remains a priority. Our aim is to introduce more sustainable processes that reduce the likelihood of similar delays in future, while maintaining the necessary standards of quality assurance.

Looking further ahead, we also intend to develop improved national reporting arrangements to provide a clearer overview of training progression, accreditation and other QA activity across Scotland.

This reporting work is still at an early stage. Our immediate focus is on addressing existing backlogs and completing the automation of remaining QA processes. Once these foundations are in place, we hope to progress the development of reporting tools that will support earlier identification of concerns, better understanding of national training activity and more informed planning.

 

Working Together to Support High-Quality Training

The effectiveness of national quality assurance depends on continued engagement with those delivering and undertaking Healthcare Science training.

We encourage trainees, supervisors and training centres to contact the QA team if they have concerns about training progression, changes to training arrangements or circumstances that may affect the completion of a programme. Early discussion can help identify appropriate support and prevent difficulties from becoming more significant.

We also welcome feedback on our developing processes and appreciate the continued cooperation of colleagues as we work to improve the quality, efficiency and sustainability of national training assurance.

For advice or assistance, please contact HCSQuality@nes.scot.nhs.uk.